arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

How Financial Reporting Can Inform Tax Policy on the Treatment of Research and Experimentation Expenditures: A Discussion and Recommendations

Mollie T. Adams & Ellen E. Best

ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research2026https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-2025-006article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the revisions to Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 174 under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). To better understand these revisions, we analyze the historical tax treatment of research and experimentation (R&E) expenditures, congressional intent as it relates to R&E, and parallel research and development (R&D) discussions in the financial reporting standards. Our analysis suggests that although some R&E expenditures benefit subsequent periods, many do not, as there is considerable uncertainty in determining which R&E projects will be successful. The policy under the TCJA requiring capitalization and amortization of R&D expenditures did not reflect the economic reality of these expenditures and had the potential to disincentivize R&D investment. Congress has only partially addressed these issues in the OBBBA, which restores expensing for domestic R&E beginning in 2025 but retains capitalization for foreign research. JEL Classifications: M41; H20; H25.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-2025-006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mollie2026,
  title        = {{How Financial Reporting Can Inform Tax Policy on the Treatment of Research and Experimentation Expenditures: A Discussion and Recommendations}},
  author       = {Mollie T. Adams & Ellen E. Best},
  journal      = {ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-2025-006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How Financial Reporting Can Inform Tax Policy on the Treatment of Research and Experimentation Expenditures: A Discussion and Recommendations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.