Navigating dual roles: The psychological well-being and role perception of ex-soldiers who served as military correctional guards

Lea Itzik

Military Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2026.2621635article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

While imprisonment's impact on correctional staff has been widely studied, little attention has been given to military prisons. Addressing this gap, the study examines role perception and mental well-being among 18 former Israeli soldiers who served as correctional guards. Using qualitative methodology and semi-structured interviews, the research reveals three key themes: the complexity of working with diverse inmate populations, navigating multiple prison authorities, and balancing burnout with a strong sense of mission and responsibility. Findings highlight the unique dual identity of military prison guards, caught between rigid military discipline and rehabilitative mandates. This tension shapes a paradoxical maneuvering space: while military discipline can heighten burnout, commitment to rehabilitation sustains meaning and purpose. By focusing on this overlooked context, the study offers practical insights for military correctional systems and introduces a dynamic theoretical model explaining how these competing institutional logics simultaneously challenge and motivate correctional officers within military settings.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2026.2621635

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lea2026,
  title        = {{Navigating dual roles: The psychological well-being and role perception of ex-soldiers who served as military correctional guards}},
  author       = {Lea Itzik},
  journal      = {Military Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2026.2621635},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating dual roles: The psychological well-being and role perception of ex-soldiers who served as military correctional guards

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.