arbiter
JournalsAccount

Uncovering the toll: The impact of perceived discrimination on health among structurally advantaged and disadvantaged groups

Chantelle Kimberley et al.

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261428465article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Although a vast literature demonstrates that discrimination correlates negatively with health satisfaction, research has yet to examine whether within-person changes in perceptions of discrimination temporally precede declines in subjective health. Studies also overlook the possibility that the relationship between perceived discrimination and health satisfaction differs for structurally advantaged and disadvantaged groups. We address these oversights by utilizing 11 annual waves of data from a nationwide random sample of adults to examine the relationship between perceived discrimination and subjective health among Māori ( N = 9,298) and New Zealand Europeans ( N = 56,499). Results from a multi-group RI-CLPM reveal that perceived discrimination has a negative cross-lagged effect on within-person changes in health satisfaction for Māori, but not for New Zealand Europeans. These results highlight the asymmetrical consequences of discrimination between structurally advantaged and disadvantaged groups, underscoring the pervasive challenges minoritized communities continue to face.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261428465

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chantelle2026,
  title        = {{Uncovering the toll: The impact of perceived discrimination on health among structurally advantaged and disadvantaged groups}},
  author       = {Chantelle Kimberley et al.},
  journal      = {Group Processes and Intergroup Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261428465},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Uncovering the toll: The impact of perceived discrimination on health among structurally advantaged and disadvantaged groups

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.