arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Benefits of Drawing and Describing for Recognizing Object Images

Anna McCarter & Jeffrey Starns

Applied Cognitive Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70167article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Drawing is beneficial for learning verbal materials, potentially because it allows for a secondary representation (visual). When learning visual materials, describing would create a secondary representation (verbal). This project investigated the relative benefits of drawing and describing when learning visual materials for a recognition memory test. In Experiment 1, participants learned images through drawing, describing, or viewing followed by an old/new recognition test. Drawing and describing both led to considerably better recognition accuracy compared with simply viewing. In Experiment 2, participants learned images through drawing, describing, tracing, or viewing and then had a three‐alternative forced‐choice task to test detailed aspects of their object memory. Drawing, describing, and tracing led to considerably better recognition accuracy than viewing, with drawing and describing leading to superior performance compared with tracing. Overall, both drawing and describing are excellent strategies for subsequent object recognition.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70167

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anna2026,
  title        = {{The Benefits of Drawing and Describing for Recognizing Object Images}},
  author       = {Anna McCarter & Jeffrey Starns},
  journal      = {Applied Cognitive Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70167},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Benefits of Drawing and Describing for Recognizing Object Images

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.