arbiter
JournalsAccount

Sustainable HRM in the Public Sector: A Question of Viability or Legitimacy?

M. A. Johnson et al.

Human Resource Management Journal (UK)2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70034article
AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Recent research has underlined the growing importance of sustainability in HRM policy and practice, taking into account long‐term multi‐stakeholder goals. However, few studies have specified the drivers and outcomes of sustainable HRM practices, nor the contradictions that arise when managers attempt to satisfy the demands of both internal and external stakeholders. Drawing on in‐depth case studies of the UK public sector, we distinguish between the institutional sustainability logics of (i) viability (concerned with necessary resources and capacities to deliver) and (ii) legitimacy (concerned with satisfying social and moral demands for fair and consistent HR practices) and explore how these two logics interact through positive and negative feedback loops. Our findings show that across an increasingly complex HRM eco‐system, the tensions between viability and legitimacy are increasingly addressed through a focus on building individual human capital and personal wellbeing rather than protecting job security and the collective ‘common good’.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70034

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{m.2026,
  title        = {{Sustainable HRM in the Public Sector: A Question of Viability or Legitimacy?}},
  author       = {M. A. Johnson et al.},
  journal      = {Human Resource Management Journal (UK)},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70034},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Sustainable HRM in the Public Sector: A Question of Viability or Legitimacy?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.