Lot Scheduling to Minimize Makespan in Permutation Flowshop

Na Li et al.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research2026https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595926500077article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This work investigates the permutation flowshop scheduling problem where each operation of any job is performed on a lot processing machine with uniform capacity. More than one job can be processed in the same lot, and the operations of all jobs in the lot are of the same completion time. Any job can be split and processed in consecutive lots, if necessary. The objective is to minimize the maximum completion time of the last operation of job, i.e., the makespan. We first examine the complexity of the considered problem, and provide a polynomial approximation algorithm when there are [Formula: see text] operations in the flowshop. We further explore three special cases with [Formula: see text] and present optimal solutions for each case, respectively. Moreover, we provide an [Formula: see text]-approximation algorithm for the situation where there are [Formula: see text] operations. Finally, the efficiency of the approximation algorithm is demonstrated via numerical experiments.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595926500077

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{na2026,
  title        = {{Lot Scheduling to Minimize Makespan in Permutation Flowshop}},
  author       = {Na Li et al.},
  journal      = {Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595926500077},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Lot Scheduling to Minimize Makespan in Permutation Flowshop

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.