Reproductive Technology and the Agency Paradox

Abhishika Dawn & Alan Gnanasekar

International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society2026https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/a1023article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

In the digital age, technology has proliferated into reproductive spaces through reproductive technologies, offering potential benefits but also raising ethical dilemmas. This article explores the complex dynamics between technological advancement and reproductive autonomy. While these advancements are often positioned as tools for women’s liberation and enhanced reproductive rights, they simultaneously establish techno-capitalist control and commodification of gestation, ultimately undermining individual agency. The article examines this tension through the film The Pod Generation by Sophie Barthes, which uses a high-tech, artificial “pod” in a speculative future to reveal an illusion of liberation and choice that accompanies technological progress. Using feminist scholarship in the field of technology studies, the article examines whether reproductive technologies like artificial wombs genuinely empower women or merely constrain them within predefined behavioral models. The research questions guiding this study are: how does the delegation of reproduction to technology reshape concepts of the body, new kinships, technology as parent partners, parental agency, and family dynamics? How does the commodification of these technologies influence the agency of the individuals involved? In what ways does the use of technologies, especially pod technology, conceptualize reproductive autonomy? The article maps a connection between fiction, theory, and real-world technologies to trace how cultural imagination of reproduction articulates broader anxieties around autonomy, agency, and the posthuman condition. Ultimately, the article concludes that reproductive technologies, embodied in speculative futures like The Pod Generation, reveal an erosion of human agency and shed light on human commercialization under the guise of technological progress.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/a1023

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{abhishika2026,
  title        = {{Reproductive Technology and the Agency Paradox}},
  author       = {Abhishika Dawn & Alan Gnanasekar},
  journal      = {International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/a1023},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reproductive Technology and the Agency Paradox

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.