Evolving and differentiated strategy? A network approach to understand Chinese development finance

Sara Caria & Stefano Ghinoi

Review of African Political Economy2025https://doi.org/10.62191/roape-2025-0022article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

In recent decades China’s engagement in international development has been widely studied, although the drivers of Chinese strategy are still being debated. This article searches for evidence of a differentiated strategy according to the endowment of natural resources and political stability of partner countries, drawing on AidData financial flows from 2000 to 2021. Through social network analysis, the article maps cooperation ties between China and African countries to understand which African countries are more similar as a result of their links to the same Chinese institutions. The results confirm the Belt and Road Initiative as a cornerstone in China’s relations with African countries. However, evidence on country-specific factors is inconclusive: overall, political stability seems to be relevant, while natural resource endowments do not emerge as a driver of specific behaviours. The findings challenge the view that Chinese engagement with African countries merely aims at securing natural resources and increasing geopolitical influence, suggesting a more complex and pragmatic approach.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62191/roape-2025-0022

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sara2025,
  title        = {{Evolving and differentiated strategy? A network approach to understand Chinese development finance}},
  author       = {Sara Caria & Stefano Ghinoi},
  journal      = {Review of African Political Economy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62191/roape-2025-0022},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Evolving and differentiated strategy? A network approach to understand Chinese development finance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.