Navigating the perpetual paradox: Unpacking dynamic managerial capabilities through a liminal lens

Vaneet Kaur

European Management Review2026https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.70053article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study redefines dynamic managerial capabilities (DMCs) through the framework of liminality, revealing their emergence amidst the paradox of change and stability. Integrating liminality theory with DMC micro‐foundations—managerial cognition, human capital, and social capital—it proposes a novel position‐processual framework across pre‐liminal, liminal, and post‐liminal phases. The key finding is that DMCs are not just sustained but actively forged within change, leveraging liminality as a productive adaptive space. As managers transform their cognition, human, and social capital through these phases, DMCs dynamically evolve via a cyclical process of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring. This perspective underscores how the strategic leveraging of these managerial factors bridges individual capabilities to robust, firm‐level dynamic capabilities, positioning managers as central to generating dynamic stability through continuous change.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.70053

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{vaneet2026,
  title        = {{Navigating the perpetual paradox: Unpacking dynamic managerial capabilities through a liminal lens}},
  author       = {Vaneet Kaur},
  journal      = {European Management Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.70053},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating the perpetual paradox: Unpacking dynamic managerial capabilities through a liminal lens

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.