Training Investment and Screening on Employee Attributes: A Complementarity View

Raginee Baruah et al.

Journal of Management Accounting Research2025https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-2023-028article
AJG 2ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

We examine how investments in training and employee selection interact to address the control problem of establishing a productive and stable relationship between employees and firms. Taking a complementarity theory perspective, we show that firms that invest highly in training also invest highly in employee selection processes and vice versa. We propose that specific employee attributes (i.e., stability and trainability) enhance the returns to training and are thus demanded and screened for by firms when committing resources to training. In turn, when firms invest in costly employee selection processes to screen for these attributes, investing in training further improves the productivity and stability of the employee-firm relationship. Examining the boundary conditions of this interdependence, we find that the complementarity between investments in training and that in screening for stability of employees increases in the creativity dependence of a firm.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-2023-028

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{raginee2025,
  title        = {{Training Investment and Screening on Employee Attributes: A Complementarity View}},
  author       = {Raginee Baruah et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Management Accounting Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-2023-028},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Training Investment and Screening on Employee Attributes: A Complementarity View

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.