arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

What Causes What: Causal Directionality Moderates Evaluative Conditioning Effects

Simone Mattavelli et al.

Social Psychological and Personality Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261426645article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Past research showed that Evaluative Conditioning (EC) effects are shaped by the framing of the relationship between conditioned stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimuli (US). We tested if causal directionality—whether the CS causes the US or the US causes the CS—moderates EC effects. Across two preregistered experiments ( N = 680), participants viewed food brands (CSs) paired with facial expressions (USs). In Experiment 1, the EC effect was stronger in the CS-causes-US than in the US-causes-CS condition, but this emerged only in self-reports. Experiment 2 extended these findings to a health-related context, with expressions framed as physical comfort/discomfort. Stronger EC effects emerged in the CS-causes-US condition on both self-report and Implicit Association Test (IAT). Aggregated analyses suggest that the superiority of the CS-causes-US (vs. US-causes-CS) condition emerged on both measures. These results refine a propositional view of EC, showing that pairing may function as a symbolic cue conveying more than co-occurrence.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261426645

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{simone2026,
  title        = {{What Causes What: Causal Directionality Moderates Evaluative Conditioning Effects}},
  author       = {Simone Mattavelli et al.},
  journal      = {Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261426645},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What Causes What: Causal Directionality Moderates Evaluative Conditioning Effects

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.