Fairness at the crossroads: integrating justice and diversity scholarship for the future of DEI

Sophie Boree Kim & Stephen W. Gilliland

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion2026https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-11-2025-0774article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to propose an integrative framework of fairness by synthesizing insights from organizational justice (OJ) and diversity and inclusion (D&I) literature. It clarifies how divergent understandings of fairness contribute to polarized reactions to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts and positions fairness as a shared foundation for bridging divides. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of 300 peer-reviewed articles from the Web of Science database was conducted. Articles were thematically analyzed to identify divergences and convergences in OJ and D&I conceptualizations of fairness, culminating in an integrative theoretical framework grounded in OJ models. Findings Fairness perceptions underpin polarized responses to DEI. Integrating OJ's focus on individual-level cognitive-affective processes with D&I's emphasis on intergroup dynamics and organizational contexts identifies three values that are central to fairness: individuality, group membership and morality. DEI backlash can be understood as perceived violations of meritocracy, procedural transparency, and moral clarity. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to published literature and theoretical exploration. Future research should examine how individuality, group membership, and morality interact to shape fairness perceptions across contexts. Practical implications The integrative fairness framework offers a basis for repairing relationships and advancing DEI with rigor. Restorative justice can help restore trust, while OJ measures offer a rigorous way to assess DEI programs' quality, implementation and impact across all groups. Originality/value This review bridges disciplinary divides by articulating a multidimensional understanding of fairness. Aligning OJ's theories and measures with D&I's understanding of identity and structural contexts addresses conceptual gaps and advances fairness research.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-11-2025-0774

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sophie2026,
  title        = {{Fairness at the crossroads: integrating justice and diversity scholarship for the future of DEI}},
  author       = {Sophie Boree Kim & Stephen W. Gilliland},
  journal      = {Equality, Diversity and Inclusion},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-11-2025-0774},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Fairness at the crossroads: integrating justice and diversity scholarship for the future of DEI

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.