Recovering the History of Chinese Amahs Travelling to Britain, 1840s–1930s

Claire Lowrie

Labour History: a journal of labour and social history2025https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2025.26article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article analyses the history of the travelling Chinese amahs (nursemaids) that came to Britain with employer families. Chinese amahs were engaged to care for children on voyages from Singapore, Hong Kong and China to London from the mid-nineteenth century to the middle of the twentieth century. Very little is known about the lives of these women and their stories have not been acknowledged in histories of Chinese labour migration. This article seeks to recover the history of Chinese amahs in Britain by drawing on fragmentary historical evidence, including shipping records, immigration documents, newspaper articles, employers’ memoirs, and institutional archives. I argue that, while the mass digitisation of historical records presents new opportunities for bringing to light the stories of mobile subaltern workers, it has not resolved the challenges associated with research of this kind.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2025.26

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{claire2025,
  title        = {{Recovering the History of Chinese Amahs Travelling to Britain, 1840s–1930s}},
  author       = {Claire Lowrie},
  journal      = {Labour History: a journal of labour and social history},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2025.26},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Recovering the History of Chinese Amahs Travelling to Britain, 1840s–1930s

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.