Farm Household Livelihood Diversification Under Climate Risk in the Central Region of Cameroon: Applying Modern Portfolio Theory

Martial Bindoumou et al.

Agricultural Economics Research Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09713441261427198article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Uncertainty related to climate change imposes a new economic environment on households and implies the need to seek alternate sources like livelihood diversification. It was found that to reduce their vulnerability to climate-related risks, they have to diversify their incomes by choosing a portfolio consisting of wild mango kernels and Gnetum africanum on one hand and, on the other, cassava sticks and maize. The results also unveiled that the optimal portfolio remains unchanged, regardless of the value of the risk-aversion coefficient. This study intended to equip rural farmers with the knowledge and principles of combining income-generating activities to boost their livelihoods and effectively fight against poverty. JEL Classification: G110, Q120, A540

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09713441261427198

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{martial2026,
  title        = {{Farm Household Livelihood Diversification Under Climate Risk in the Central Region of Cameroon: Applying Modern Portfolio Theory}},
  author       = {Martial Bindoumou et al.},
  journal      = {Agricultural Economics Research Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09713441261427198},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Farm Household Livelihood Diversification Under Climate Risk in the Central Region of Cameroon: Applying Modern Portfolio Theory

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.