Distributionally robust optimization with multimodal decision-dependent ambiguity sets
Xian Yu & Beste Basciftci
What the paper says
We consider a two-stage distributionally robust optimization (DRO) model with multimodal uncertainty, where both the mode probabilities and uncertainty distributions could be affected by the first-stage decisions. To address this setting, we propose a generic framework by introducing a $$\phi $$ ϕ -divergence based ambiguity set to characterize the decision-dependent mode probabilities and further consider both moment-based and Wasserstein distance-based ambiguity sets to characterize the uncertainty distribution under each mode. We identify two special $$\phi $$ ϕ -divergence examples (variation distance and $$\chi ^2$$ χ 2 -distance) and provide specific forms of decision dependence relationships under which we can derive tractable reformulations. Furthermore, we investigate the benefits of considering multimodality in a DRO model compared to a single-modal counterpart through an analytical analysis. Additionally, we develop a separation-based decomposition algorithm to solve the resulting multimodal decision-dependent DRO models with finite convergence and optimality guarantee under certain settings. We provide a detailed computational study over two example problem settings, the facility location problem and shipment planning problem with pricing, to illustrate our results, which demonstrate that omission of multimodality or decision-dependent uncertainties within DRO frameworks result in inadequately performing solutions with worse in-sample and out-of-sample performances under various settings. We further demonstrate the speed-ups obtained by the solution algorithm against the off-the-shelf solver over various instances.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.