arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

How Bystanders’ Perception of Interpersonal Synchrony Shapes their Beliefs and Intentions Toward Dyads in a Naturalistic Setting

Pedro Marques-Quinteiro et al.

Spanish Journal of Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2025.10018article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This research builds on previous work showing that interpersonal synchrony in dyads is a social cue that informs bystanders about the dyads' psychological attributes and influences their intentions to affiliate with members of dyads. Across two studies, participants were asked to observe dyads walking down a corridor during the TV show Shark Tank, rate the dyads' collective efficacy, and express their own intentions to affiliate with them. The results replicate and extend previous work, suggesting that perceived synchrony, collective efficacy, and affiliation intentions are positively correlated, and that perceived synchrony can have positive spill-over effects on outcomes such as attracting business proposals and being liked by others.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2025.10018

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{pedro2026,
  title        = {{How Bystanders’ Perception of Interpersonal Synchrony Shapes their Beliefs and Intentions Toward Dyads in a Naturalistic Setting}},
  author       = {Pedro Marques-Quinteiro et al.},
  journal      = {Spanish Journal of Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2025.10018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How Bystanders’ Perception of Interpersonal Synchrony Shapes their Beliefs and Intentions Toward Dyads in a Naturalistic Setting

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.