FDI and trade for foreign market entry: theory and evidence from Estonia

Per Botolf Maurseth et al.

Baltic Journal of Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2025.2463863article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This article investigates firms' strategies for international expansion, foreign direct investment (FDI) and exports. We use the framework of Helpman et al. (2004) to illustrate how firm-level productivity differences influence these strategies. We extend this model with multifactor production processes, encompassing both trade in goods and services. The model predicts that trade and FDI can be both substitutes and complements. Our empirical analysis uses detailed Estonian firm-market-level data to explore the model's predictions by estimating the intensive and extensive trade margins and internationalization choices of firms between trade and FDI. The empirical findings indicate that selection into exporting is determined by past productivity. There is evidence consistent with spillover effects in goods exports from other exporters to the same destination. Outward FDI complements both goods and services exports. Our findings underscore the complexity of firms' choices for international expansion, urging a nuanced dichotomy between FDI and exports.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2025.2463863

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{per2025,
  title        = {{FDI and trade for foreign market entry: theory and evidence from Estonia}},
  author       = {Per Botolf Maurseth et al.},
  journal      = {Baltic Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2025.2463863},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

FDI and trade for foreign market entry: theory and evidence from Estonia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.