Stakeholders’ Roles and Motivations in the Management of Wetlands in Uganda: A Case Study of Lutembe Bay Wetland

Anthony Kadoma & Isreal Kibirige

Journal of Environment and Development2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965251412778article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Stakeholders globally participate in the conservation and management of wetland resources. They play different roles with divergent motives. Wetlands are recognised as biodiversity hotspots supporting over 40% of plants and animal species. In Uganda, the roles and motivations in wetland management are less studied, and hence, this study focuses on Lutembe Bay wetland. Thirty participants were interviewed for this qualitative case study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data generated. Results highlight that stakeholders include community members, businesspeople, government bureaucrats, and intermediaries. Their roles ranged from wetland use, governance, and policy-making. The roles were motivated by the need to increase access to water, improve livelihoods, economic gain, infrastructure development, and conservation. There is need for behaviour changes and making conscious choices to achieve National and Sustainable Development Goals. Wetlands need to be conserved, though there are still conflicts and disagreements regarding their management in Uganda.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965251412778

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anthony2026,
  title        = {{Stakeholders’ Roles and Motivations in the Management of Wetlands in Uganda: A Case Study of Lutembe Bay Wetland}},
  author       = {Anthony Kadoma & Isreal Kibirige},
  journal      = {Journal of Environment and Development},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965251412778},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Stakeholders’ Roles and Motivations in the Management of Wetlands in Uganda: A Case Study of Lutembe Bay Wetland

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.