No evidence that same‐language subtitles improve children's reading fluency

Anastasiya Lopukhina et al.

British Journal of Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70066article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

High-profile campaigns globally have argued that same-language television subtitles may help children improve their reading. In this intervention study, we tested the causal hypothesis that exposure to subtitles improves children's reading fluency. We tested 127 British children in Years 2 and 3 before and after a 6-week home-based intervention, in which children were randomly assigned to an experimental group that watched television with English subtitles or a control group that watched television without subtitles. Children's reading fluency was assessed via two standard tests of reading fluency and their engagement with subtitles while watching videos, measured with eye-tracking. Results showed that both groups improved their reading fluency over 6 weeks. Crucially, there was no evidence that subtitle exposure (of around 66 hr on average) drove an improvement in reading fluency, or that greater subtitle exposure provided any additional benefit. We conclude that same-language subtitles are unlikely to improve children's reading fluency. However, the primary school reading curriculum has a positive impact on reading fluency that can be observed over a relatively short time-scale.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70066

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anastasiya2026,
  title        = {{No evidence that same‐language subtitles improve children's reading fluency}},
  author       = {Anastasiya Lopukhina et al.},
  journal      = {British Journal of Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70066},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

No evidence that same‐language subtitles improve children's reading fluency

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.