Reading the Zoom Room: Union Negotiators’ Experience of Virtual Bargaining during COVID-19

Jason Foster

Labour / Le Travail2025https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2025v95.009article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

One adaptation required by the covid-19 pandemic was a shift to virtual meetings. Collective bargaining has traditionally been conducted in person, but covid forced union and employer negotiators to adopt virtual forms of bargaining. This article examines union negotiators’ experiences with virtual bargaining in this period – first, to document the nature of the adaptations made during a historical public health event, and second, to determine whether either the shift to virtual bargaining or other covid restrictions undermined union bargaining power. It finds that the technical aspects of virtual bargaining did not significantly impact bargaining power, but broader challenges caused by covid did negatively impact union bargaining power at and away from the table.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2025v95.009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jason2025,
  title        = {{Reading the Zoom Room: Union Negotiators’ Experience of Virtual Bargaining during COVID-19}},
  author       = {Jason Foster},
  journal      = {Labour / Le Travail},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2025v95.009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reading the Zoom Room: Union Negotiators’ Experience of Virtual Bargaining during COVID-19

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.