The genesis of blue ocean strategy

Gregory C. Unruh et al.

International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2026.152380article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This case study traces the development of blue ocean strategy from its academic origins to its emergence as a global management phenomenon. Through an in-depth examination of W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne's research journey from 1984 to 2005, we analyse how two INSEAD professors successfully bridged the academic-practitioner divide to create one of the most influential strategy frameworks of the 21st century. The case study reveals how their approach evolved from traditional academic publishing toward practice-based research, culminating in a framework that challenged Michael Porter's dominant Five Forces model. The paper demonstrates how Kim and Mauborgne developed dynamic capabilities for sensing market opportunities, seizing practitioner needs, and reconfiguring their research approach to create both academic credibility and practical utility. The blue ocean strategy phenomenon exemplifies how academic ideas can achieve global influence when researchers successfully navigate competing institutional logics and build authentic relationships with practitioner communities.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2026.152380

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gregory2026,
  title        = {{The genesis of blue ocean strategy}},
  author       = {Gregory C. Unruh et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2026.152380},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The genesis of blue ocean strategy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.