arbiter
JournalsAccount

Composite Uncertainty Indicators and Stock Market Returns: Based on Supervised Dimension Reduction Techniques

Yongan Xu et al.

International Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70023article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study develops two composite uncertainty indicators for China ( U SPCA and U PLS ) by employing scaled principal component analysis (SPCA) and partial least squares regression (PLS) as dimensionality reduction techniques to synthesise critical information from multiple uncertainty indices. This study subsequently evaluates the effectiveness of these techniques in predicting returns in China's stock markets. Empirical findings demonstrate that the SPCA and PLS methodology substantially enhances stock return forecasting across in‐sample and out‐of‐sample tests while generating meaningful economic benefits for mean‐variance optimised portfolios. Furthermore, both U SPCA and U PLS outperform individual uncertainty indices and conventional economic predictors in predictive capability. In particular, the forecasting power of the two composite indicators is stronger during bear market phases than under bull market conditions. The analysis also reveals that geopolitical events such as the Russia–Ukraine conflict can temporarily reduce the predictive efficacy of uncertainty‐based indicators for stock returns.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70023

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yongan2026,
  title        = {{Composite Uncertainty Indicators and Stock Market Returns: Based on Supervised Dimension Reduction Techniques}},
  author       = {Yongan Xu et al.},
  journal      = {International Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70023},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Composite Uncertainty Indicators and Stock Market Returns: Based on Supervised Dimension Reduction Techniques

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.