A Fair Bandwidth Scanning Strategy to Detect an Adversary

Andrey Garnaev & Wade Trappe

International Game Theory Review2026https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219198926400013article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Detecting malicious users or unauthorized activities is a critical challenge in dynamic spectrum access. Traditionally, in such problems, an intrusion detection system (IDS) aims to maximize detection probability. Meanwhile, in networks or radio spectrum problems with multiple nodes or bands, respectively, a protocol that maximizes detection probability might lead to focusing on scanning the most plausible nodes or bands for intrusion and neglecting to scan less plausible ones due to limited scanning resources. To address this challenge, we propose a protocol that maximizes the fairness of detection probabilities across all bands within the bandwidth. We consider [Formula: see text]-fairness as a fairness criterion. By using a game-theoretical approach, we model the IDS, which has to decide which of the bands to scan and how long to do it when the IDS faces an adversary who endorses artificial intelligence (AI), enabling the adversary not only to infiltrate the bandwidth without being detected but also to do so in a less predictable manner for the IDS. The equilibrium strategies of the IDS and adversary are derived. An advantage of the fairness detection probability protocol in comparison with the maximizing detection probability protocol is illustrated.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219198926400013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrey2026,
  title        = {{A Fair Bandwidth Scanning Strategy to Detect an Adversary}},
  author       = {Andrey Garnaev & Wade Trappe},
  journal      = {International Game Theory Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219198926400013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Fair Bandwidth Scanning Strategy to Detect an Adversary

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.