Dynamic Volatility Spillovers among Major US Technology Companies: A Time-Varying Connectedness Analysis
Mohamed Ismail Mohamed Riyath & A. C. Aasik
What the paper says
The technology sector’s rapid growth and increasing market concentration have fundamentally altered market dynamics and volatility patterns among leading firms. This study investigates the volatility spillovers among nine major US technology companies. Specifically, the study captures the interdependence and the level of influence corresponding to the stock return volatilities of these firms on one another. Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, Intel, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla were sourced from Investing.com. The daily data was collected between April 1, 2014, and May 31, 2024. We apply the Connectedness Approach framework to the time-varying parameter vector autoregression model. This methodology estimates several metrics: the total connectedness index, directional measures of volatility transmission, and pairwise relationship indicators. The analysis shows that Microsoft and Google emerge as dominant net transmitters, while IBM and Intel function as primary receivers. Tesla's receiver status despite large market capitalization confirms that ecosystem positioning rather than market size determines transmission hierarchy. The Total Connectedness Index shows significant variation during market crises, intensifying spillovers while preserving network structure. Amazon and Nvidia demonstrate variable transmission capacity. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of time-varying volatility transmission networks among leading technology firms, revealing systemic risk patterns and network effects crucial for investment and regulatory decision-making.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.