← Back to results Adoption of Hip Fracture Care Standards: A Mixed‐Methods Analysis of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives Bernadette Brady et al.
Abstract Despite high facility-level implementation of the Care Standard, patient adoption of post-discharge refracture prevention strategies remains suboptimal. Bridging this gap requires multi-faceted, consumer-centred solutions and improved interdisciplinary training to enhance outcomes and reduce refracture risk, particularly in diverse and multicultural populations.
1 citation
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70124 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{bernadette2026,
title = {{Adoption of Hip Fracture Care Standards: A Mixed‐Methods Analysis of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives}},
author = {Bernadette Brady et al.},
journal = {Australasian Journal on Ageing},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70124},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Adoption of Hip Fracture Care Standards: A Mixed‐Methods Analysis of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives
AU - al., Bernadette Brady et
JO - Australasian Journal on Ageing
PY - 2026
ER - Bernadette Brady et al. (2026). Adoption of Hip Fracture Care Standards: A Mixed‐Methods Analysis of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives. *Australasian Journal on Ageing*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70124 Bernadette Brady et al.. "Adoption of Hip Fracture Care Standards: A Mixed‐Methods Analysis of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives." *Australasian Journal on Ageing* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70124. Adoption of Hip Fracture Care Standards: A Mixed‐Methods Analysis of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives
Bernadette Brady et al. · Australasian Journal on Ageing · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70124 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 M · momentum 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.