Sowing Dependency: Unravelling the Rational Addiction of Agricultural Fertilizer Subsidies in India

Rakkshet Singhaal

Agricultural Economics Research Review2025https://doi.org/10.1177/09713441251389413article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

By utilizing the rational addiction framework, this article investigates the dynamics of fertilizer consumption influenced by subsidy policies. By estimating a demand equation that incorporates addictive behaviours—tolerance, reinforcement and withdrawal—the research highlights how past consumption influences future usage, creating a cycle of dependency that is difficult to break. Empirical evidence supports the hypothesis that subsidy dependence in Indian agriculture mimics addictive behaviour, with farmers increasing consumption over time despite diminishing returns. This addiction not only perpetuates environmental and financial inefficiencies but also hinders policy reforms aimed at sustainable agricultural practices and showcases the need for a gradual transition towards more sustainable farming methods. JEL Classification: N55, Q18, H53, C23

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09713441251389413

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rakkshet2025,
  title        = {{Sowing Dependency: Unravelling the Rational Addiction of Agricultural Fertilizer Subsidies in India}},
  author       = {Rakkshet Singhaal},
  journal      = {Agricultural Economics Research Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09713441251389413},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Sowing Dependency: Unravelling the Rational Addiction of Agricultural Fertilizer Subsidies in India

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.