Identity and Wildfire Risk: Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Climate Change Attitudes in Los Angeles

Adrian D. Pantoja et al.

Social Science Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70137article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT Objective This article examines the effects of wildfire risks and other factors in structuring Latina/o, Black, Asian‐American, and White attitudes toward climate change and a willingness to pay for renewable energy. Methods Our analysis comes from the Los Angeles Public Opinion Survey (LAPOS). Ordered logistic and logistic regressions are used to test the effects of personal experiences and threat perceptions, social norms, political beliefs, and racial, ethnic, and gender identity in shaping environmental attitudes. Results Climate change risk perceptions are highest among Latina/o, Black, and women survey respondents. Yet, these same groups were less willing to bear greater costs for clean energy. Threat perceptions in the form of wildfire risks significantly shaped attitudes across different ethnic and racial groups in Los Angeles. Conclusion This study advances our understanding of climate change attitudes among Angelenos with different racial, ethnic, and gender identities. The unique survey and sample allow us to comparatively test the effects of a wide range of theoretically relevant factors that are known to shape attitudes toward climate change and policies to mitigate its adverse effects.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70137

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{adrian2026,
  title        = {{Identity and Wildfire Risk: Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Climate Change Attitudes in Los Angeles}},
  author       = {Adrian D. Pantoja et al.},
  journal      = {Social Science Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70137},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Identity and Wildfire Risk: Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Climate Change Attitudes in Los Angeles

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.