Cultural labour, income support, and the welfare state: Non-arts funding and funding the arts

Steph Daughtry & Sam Whiting

Journal of Sociology2025https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833241309856article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Cultural labour intersects with other forms of labour, such as immaterial and affective labour. However, it is distinct from these in its specific goal of producing ‘culture.’ Furthermore, the conditions necessary for cultural labour to thrive resemble that which Pierre Bourdieu referred to as skholè , unimpeded time to pursue one's work. Yet the problem of resourcing this labour and equitably funding it remains a unique issue. This paper will examine cultural labour and issues of equity in the contemporary Australian context, providing an overview of how artists have used arts and non-arts funding to resource their labour. Through a discussion of Australian cultural policy, this paper identifies key insufficiencies of project-based grant funding. By acknowledging the policy/practice gap in Australian cultural policy, the paper concludes that an understanding of the need to resource skholè effectively is necessary if we are to expect equitable access to and output of cultural labour practices.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833241309856

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{steph2025,
  title        = {{Cultural labour, income support, and the welfare state: Non-arts funding and funding the arts}},
  author       = {Steph Daughtry & Sam Whiting},
  journal      = {Journal of Sociology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833241309856},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cultural labour, income support, and the welfare state: Non-arts funding and funding the arts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.