Cutoff for Contingency Table and Torus Random Walks with Low Incremental Correlations

Zihao Fang & Andrew Heeszel

Journal of Theoretical Probability2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-026-01492-7article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We use the correlation matrix of the generating distribution to determine the mixing time for random walks on the torus $$(\mathbb {Z}/q\mathbb {Z})^n$$ ( Z / q Z ) n . We present our method in the context of the Diaconis–Gangolli random walk on both the $$1 \times n$$ 1 × n and $$m \times n$$ m × n contingency tables over $$\mathbb {Z}/q\mathbb {Z}$$ Z / q Z . In the $$1 \times n$$ 1 × n case, we prove that the random walk exhibits cutoff at time $$\dfrac{n q^2 \log (n)}{8 \pi ^2}$$ n q 2 log ( n ) 8 π 2 when $$q \gg n$$ q ≫ n ; in the $$m \times n$$ m × n case, where m and n are of the same order, we establish cutoff for the random walk at time $$\dfrac{mn q^2 \log (mn)}{16 \pi ^2}$$ m n q 2 log ( m n ) 16 π 2 when $$q \gg n^2$$ q ≫ n 2 . Our method reveals that a general class of random walks on the torus $$(\mathbb {Z}/q\mathbb {Z})^n$$ ( Z / q Z ) n has cutoff. If each coordinate of the

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-026-01492-7

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{zihao2026,
  title        = {{Cutoff for Contingency Table and Torus Random Walks with Low Incremental Correlations}},
  author       = {Zihao Fang & Andrew Heeszel},
  journal      = {Journal of Theoretical Probability},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-026-01492-7},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cutoff for Contingency Table and Torus Random Walks with Low Incremental Correlations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.