Fear of the Draw, Consumption and Mistaken Heuristics: Profit Opportunities in the Football Betting Market

Bruce Lezana

Journal of Sports Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025261438385article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines inefficiencies in football betting markets by analyzing the gap between bookmaker odds and empirically estimated probabilities. Using English Premier League data and a combination of Markov processes and ordered logit model, the paper constructs a betting strategy that does not rely on superior predictive power but exploits market mispricing. The strategy consistently yields abnormal returns, particularly for draws and away teams, challenging the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The analysis reveals potential behavioral biases, like emotions, and reliance on heuristics, which distort market prices. Robustness checks with data from other major European leagues support these findings. The results have broader implications for financial markets, as they highlight how behavioral patterns can create exploitable inefficiencies. We conclude that sports betting thus serves as a simplified, data-rich setting to test theories of market behavior, offering insights into how information, psychology, and pricing may interact in both betting and financial domains.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025261438385

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bruce2026,
  title        = {{Fear of the Draw, Consumption and Mistaken Heuristics: Profit Opportunities in the Football Betting Market}},
  author       = {Bruce Lezana},
  journal      = {Journal of Sports Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025261438385},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Fear of the Draw, Consumption and Mistaken Heuristics: Profit Opportunities in the Football Betting Market

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.