Global Carbon Taxation: Analyzing Pollution Effects When Mobile Firms Trade

Nelly Exbrayat et al.

Journal of Public Economic Theory2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70051article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

This paper examines the implications of a global carbon tax within a framework that includes asymmetrically sized countries, imperfectly competitive markets, and mobile, heterogeneous firms engaged in international trade. In the short run, the tax primarily produces Pigouvian effects—raising prices, reducing production, and lowering emissions, which aligns with established literature. In the long run, the mobility of firms introduces additional effects, influenced by trade intensity. Specifically, the tax acts as a dispersion force, encouraging firms to relocate to smaller markets to minimize tax burdens, thus revealing its spatial non‐neutrality across varying market sizes. High trade costs exacerbate this effect, potentially eliminating the most environmentally favorable locations. From a welfare perspective, the tension between consumer surplus and emissions can be mitigated if consumers are environmentally conscious and green policies are complemented by trade policies.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70051

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nelly2025,
  title        = {{Global Carbon Taxation: Analyzing Pollution Effects When Mobile Firms Trade}},
  author       = {Nelly Exbrayat et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Economic Theory},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70051},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Global Carbon Taxation: Analyzing Pollution Effects When Mobile Firms Trade

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.