Industrial policy along the mining value chain: a new taxonomy and case studies

Guendalina Anzolin & Carlo Pietrobelli

Journal of International Business Policy2025https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-025-00221-xarticle
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The strategic importance of the mining sector has grown significantly amid the twin transitions toward digitalization and sustainability, highlighting the need for active, well-coordinated industrial policies. Yet, government institutions have often developed such policies in siloes, leading to a lack of systemic focus. As industrial policy becomes increasingly intertwined with global value chains (GVCs), with many economies targeting specific stages of mining value chains, there is a pressing need for frameworks that support more coherent industrial policy design. This paper proposes a novel taxonomy to understand and justify the design of coherent industrial policies in the mining sector. Drawing on case studies from Australia, South Africa, and Chile, we demonstrate the taxonomy’s analytical value and practical relevance. Our findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in the policy instruments deployed and in the composition of industrial policy packages across the three countries. We also observe varying degrees of internal coherence and differing focal points along the mining value chain, reflecting distinct national strategies and capacities.

6 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-025-00221-x

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{guendalina2025,
  title        = {{Industrial policy along the mining value chain: a new taxonomy and case studies}},
  author       = {Guendalina Anzolin & Carlo Pietrobelli},
  journal      = {Journal of International Business Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-025-00221-x},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Industrial policy along the mining value chain: a new taxonomy and case studies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.44 × 0.4 = 0.18
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.