arbiter
JournalsAccount

Reclaiming power: Tokenization platforms and incumbency in global finance

Alexandru-Stefan Goghie

Competition and Change2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294261424301article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper examines the rise of tokenization platforms as strategic instruments through which incumbent banks reassert power within the post-crisis financial system. Challenging dominant accounts of platform capitalism that emphasize disruption, data extraction, and/or ecosystem expansion, it argues that bank-led tokenization platforms, developed by institutions such as UBS, JPMorgan, HSBC, and Citi, constitute a distinct modality of platform power. Rather than dis-intermediating finance, these platforms operate through infrastructural embedding and regulatory compliance, offering other institutions more efficient, lower-friction ways to operate in critical financial segments. This enables banks to reorganize balance sheet operations and reclaim strategic centrality in private credit, repo markets, and asset management, responding to regulatory pressures and competition from non-bank financial actors. In doing so, this paper advances a political economy account of tokenization platforms that move beyond existing theories of platform power, highlighting infrastructural efficiency and reconfiguration as central mechanisms of contemporary financial authority.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294261424301

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexandru-stefan2026,
  title        = {{Reclaiming power: Tokenization platforms and incumbency in global finance}},
  author       = {Alexandru-Stefan Goghie},
  journal      = {Competition and Change},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294261424301},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reclaiming power: Tokenization platforms and incumbency in global finance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.