Banks and the noisy geopolitics of big tech regulation in Europe

Scott James & Lucia Quaglia

Competition and Change2025https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251327729article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.48

Abstract

The EU’s Digital Markets Act represents an ambitious attempt to curtail Big Techs’ market and infrastructural power by imposing significant new ex ante regulatory obligations on the largest digital platforms or ‘gatekeepers’. The EU requirements are designed to constrain Big Techs’ ability to exploit economies of scale and network effects to the detriment of market competition and consumer protection. Although the DMA does not regulate platform financial services directly, EU financial regulators and EU financial institutions were amongst the most vocal and influential supporters of the EU’s new digital regulatory agenda. How can we explain this? Drawing on theories of business power, we argue that financial actors leveraged their influence through ‘noisy geopolitics’ by expanding the breadth of the anti-Big Tech coalition and reframing their preferences around the EU’s emergent digital sovereignty agenda. In contrast, the coalition of (predominantly) US Big Techs and US officials increasingly fragmented in the face of mounting political opposition at home and the failure to find wider business allies in Europe.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251327729

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{scott2025,
  title        = {{Banks and the noisy geopolitics of big tech regulation in Europe}},
  author       = {Scott James & Lucia Quaglia},
  journal      = {Competition and Change},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251327729},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Banks and the noisy geopolitics of big tech regulation in Europe

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.