arbiter
JournalsAccount

Online Travel Agency Participation: An Empirical Investigation of Its Financial Contribution to U.S. Hotel Profitability

Peter O’Connor et al.

Cornell Hospitality Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655251318185article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.48

Abstract

Online travel agencies (OTAs) have become an important driver of business, although their utility remains controversial. While hotels appreciate the resulting bookings, many resent the resulting commissions. While extensively debated in the literature, considerable uncertainty remaining as to whether OTA participation is beneficial or detrimental to hotel profitability. To address this gap, we adopt a transaction cost economics approach, analyzing property-level data from the income statements of 644 U.S. hotels from Smith Travel Research. Findings suggest that OTA participation is positively and significantly related to occupancy, REVPAR and EBITDA at a macro level, with each dollar increase in commission resulting in a 1.123%, $20.20 and $7.08 increase, respectively (2019$s). However, analysis by class reveals that while working with intermediaries drives top-line revenues for all hotels, it is associated with lower profitability for economy properties, implying that OTA participation is not universally good.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655251318185

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{peter2025,
  title        = {{Online Travel Agency Participation: An Empirical Investigation of Its Financial Contribution to U.S. Hotel Profitability}},
  author       = {Peter O’Connor et al.},
  journal      = {Cornell Hospitality Quarterly},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655251318185},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Online Travel Agency Participation: An Empirical Investigation of Its Financial Contribution to U.S. Hotel Profitability

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.