Equity in ICT-Based Coproduction: Evidence from San Francisco

Andreas D Sihotang

Information Polity2026https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255261434835article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Smart cities increasingly rely on ICT-based coproduction, in which governments use digital platforms to engage citizens in reporting problems and requesting public services. While this model is often assumed to enhance inclusivity, it also raises equity concerns, as opportunities for engagement and experiences with coproduction may vary systematically across social groups. Existing research on ICT-enabled coproduction has focused primarily on participation disparities, offering mixed evidence and often overlooking inequities in earlier and later stages of engagement. Drawing on individual-level data from the San Francisco City Survey, this study examines equity across multiple stages of coproduction—including awareness of opportunities, participation, channel choice, and satisfaction—and across multiple dimensions of equity , encompassing procedural and experiential outcome. The findings show that inequities emerge at different stages for different groups, highlighting the need for ICT-based coproduction systems that address equity beyond participation alone.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255261434835

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andreas2026,
  title        = {{Equity in ICT-Based Coproduction: Evidence from San Francisco}},
  author       = {Andreas D Sihotang},
  journal      = {Information Polity},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255261434835},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Equity in ICT-Based Coproduction: Evidence from San Francisco

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.