arbiter
JournalsAccount

CEOs’ Prosocial Tendency and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness

Mark J. Kohlbeck & Lin Wang

Journal of the American Taxation Association2025https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2022-029article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Many CEOs are philanthropists who express their passion for social welfare through work with various charities and foundations. However, the consequences of these prosocial behaviors for their firms are unclear. This study investigates whether CEOs’ prosocial tendency, measured by their service on the boards of one or more charities, is associated with corporate tax aggressiveness. We find that firms with CEOs who have prosocial tendency have a lower level of tax aggressiveness than firms with CEOs who do not have this tendency. We further find that financial incentives may diminish the inhibitory effect of CEO prosocial tendency on corporate tax aggressiveness. By contrast, a firm’s positive reputation could strengthen the inhibitory effect of prosocial tendency on tax aggressiveness. Our results provide evidence that CEO prosocial tendency influences a firm’s tax planning and policies. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: D64; H25.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2022-029

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mark2025,
  title        = {{CEOs’ Prosocial Tendency and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness}},
  author       = {Mark J. Kohlbeck & Lin Wang},
  journal      = {Journal of the American Taxation Association},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2022-029},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

CEOs’ Prosocial Tendency and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.