An Ecological Momentary Assessment of Academic Engagement: Proof of Concept for Application to Participation Research

Allison R. Fleming et al.

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552251355355article
AJG 1
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Community participation is an important area of rehabilitation research. However, accurately capturing individual experiences with participation is difficult using conventional survey approaches. Biases in self-report and lack of contextual information are leading threats to understanding participation and how individual circumstances influence outcomes. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) addresses weaknesses in conventional data-collection approaches that could enhance participation research but presents the potential for high participant burden and low compliance that threaten data quality. The purpose of this paper is to present findings from a proof-of-concept EMA study focused on academic engagement as a form of community participation in sample of college students enriched for disability. We report initial feasibility and validation results comparing momentary data with conventional measures of academic engagement. Finally, we discuss potential application of this method in participation outcome research and rehabilitation practice.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552251355355

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{allison2025,
  title        = {{An Ecological Momentary Assessment of Academic Engagement: Proof of Concept for Application to Participation Research}},
  author       = {Allison R. Fleming et al.},
  journal      = {Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552251355355},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

An Ecological Momentary Assessment of Academic Engagement: Proof of Concept for Application to Participation Research

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.