A force field for funding: philanthrocapitalism and localisation in Dutch development

Stasja Koot & Manon Peek

International Development Planning Review2026https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2025.35article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Increasingly, international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) have become dependent on major donors. Known as philanthrocapitalism, this was critiqued for a lack of democracy and downward accountability, leading to a concentration of power among a privileged few. Simultaneously, the call for localisation increased, which refers to more inclusion and empowerment of INGOs’ local partners. In this article, we interrogate how Dutch INGOs deal with attracting major donors on the one hand (i.e. philanthrocapitalism) and demands for increasing downward accountability (i.e. localisation) on the other. Based on interviews, work experience and report analysis, we explore these allegedly contradictory movements and analyse the power dynamics regarding its four attributes of knowledge, capacity, authority and accountability. We argue that, although power can be found at all levels in the ‘force field’ between philanthrocapitalism and localisation, funding relations create space for repression and therefore the concentration of power among major donors functions largely as an obstacle to localisation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2025.35

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stasja2026,
  title        = {{A force field for funding: philanthrocapitalism and localisation in Dutch development}},
  author       = {Stasja Koot & Manon Peek},
  journal      = {International Development Planning Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2025.35},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A force field for funding: philanthrocapitalism and localisation in Dutch development

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.