arbiter
JournalsAccount

Do Unions Still Care about Class? Text Mining a Near-Century Decline of Class Rhetoric in a British Trade Union

Cameron Rhys Herbert

Sociology2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385261416287article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Using an original dataset of 91 years of the Fire Brigades Union’s journal, The Firefighter , we use text mining to analyse changes in how the union discusses class. We show that where class was once a central discourse within the union, it is now rarely mentioned. We attempt to show why this has occurred, connecting these results to the broader debate in sociology concerning whether class identities are declining. We argue that while class remains a core part of the union’s organisational identity, the decline of class rhetoric results primarily from political change. In particular, we argue that the progressive marginalisation of traditional working-class political rhetoric by the Labour Party has strongly influenced how unions talk about social class. We argue that these findings have important implications for our understanding of class politics in contemporary Britain and the role of class identities in union renewal.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385261416287

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cameron2026,
  title        = {{Do Unions Still Care about Class? Text Mining a Near-Century Decline of Class Rhetoric in a British Trade Union}},
  author       = {Cameron Rhys Herbert},
  journal      = {Sociology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385261416287},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Do Unions Still Care about Class? Text Mining a Near-Century Decline of Class Rhetoric in a British Trade Union

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.