arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Transforming the Work Experience of Members in Coworking Spaces: Theory-Based Interventions

Wendell C. Taylor

Journal of Personnel Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000378article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract: One aftereffect of the COVID-19 pandemic has been renewed interest in alternatives to traditional work offices. One such alternative is the coworking space, which combines the structure and community of the traditional office with the freedom and independence of freelance work. Despite growing interest in coworking spaces, I found no publications describing interventions to improve this work experience. Therefore, I evaluated two interventions, Booster Breaks (15-min health-promoting breaks) and work sprints (public accountability for achieving work goals), as initiatives to improve the coworking space experience. Among the five critical components of the coworking space experience (community, collaboration, amenities, location, cost), community, collaboration, and amenities can be enhanced by Booster Breaks and work sprints to advance this evolving and autonomous work community.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000378

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wendell2026,
  title        = {{Transforming the Work Experience of Members in Coworking Spaces: Theory-Based Interventions}},
  author       = {Wendell C. Taylor},
  journal      = {Journal of Personnel Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000378},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Transforming the Work Experience of Members in Coworking Spaces: Theory-Based Interventions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.