Functions of identity scale: Validation in Serbian emerging adults

Mila Guberinić et al.

Psihologija2025https://doi.org/10.2298/psi240210031garticle
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The aim of the study was to validate the Serbian version of the Functions of Identity Scale (FIS), a measure of five functions of identity: structure, harmony, goals, future, and personal control. The sample consisted of 384 emerging adult students (78.4% female; Mage = 21.60, SDage = 2.73). Findings replicated the validity of the 15-item five-factor (structure, harmony, goals, future, personal control) model of FIS previously documented with English, Italian and Turkish language versions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed strong support for the five-factor model, compared to a single-factor model. Positive correlations between FIS dimensions and indicators of healthy psychosocial functioning and negative correlations with indicators of internalizing problems were found, as expected. FIS Serbian version is a promising tool for evaluating identity functions in emerging adults, contributing to cross-cultural validity and growing research on identity in this cultural context.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/psi240210031g

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mila2025,
  title        = {{Functions of identity scale: Validation in Serbian emerging adults}},
  author       = {Mila Guberinić et al.},
  journal      = {Psihologija},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/psi240210031g},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Functions of identity scale: Validation in Serbian emerging adults

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.