Characterizing Survivors' Descriptions of #MeToo Backlash

Alexis A. Adams‐Clark et al.

Journal of Community Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.70086article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

After going "viral" in 2017, #MeToo brought renewed attention to the issue of sexual violence. While research suggests #MeToo has benefited survivors, journalists have frequently referenced a perceived "backlash." Drawing on interdisciplinary conceptualizations of social backlash, this study aimed to systematically catalogue types of perceived #MeToo backlash among survivors. Using an inductive thematic analytic approach, the study team coded 324 survivors' responses to an open-ended survey question about examples of #MeToo backlash they have heard about. Nine codes characterized participants' descriptions and were organized into four themes - Denial of the Severity and Reality of Rape, Threats to Traditional Power Structures, Repercussions of Disclosure/Activism, and Dissatisfaction with the #MeToo Movement. Survivors described multiple forms of backlash occurring at various levels of the social ecology. By categorizing perceptions of backlash, this study lays the groundwork for future work querying survivors' direct experiences of backlash and its influence on their lives.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.70086

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexis2026,
  title        = {{Characterizing Survivors' Descriptions of #MeToo Backlash}},
  author       = {Alexis A. Adams‐Clark et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Community Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.70086},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Characterizing Survivors' Descriptions of #MeToo Backlash

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.