Safety climate factors in construction – a literature review

Tariq Umar

Policy and Practice in Health and Safety2020https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2020.1777799review
AJG 1
Weight
0.54

What the paper says

It is an established fact that a mature safety climate and a rich safety culture contribute to achieving a safe workplace. This paper aims to explore and to make explicit the existing safety climate assessment tools and dimensions and suggests the leading factors that can be used for safety climate assessment in construction. The construction industry and the status of occupational safety and health are firstly discussed in a global context. The concept of safety climate is then discussed with a review of different safety climate factors from the published literature. A qualitative research method was employed to explore the existing safety climate factors. A total of 19 safety climate assessment tools with 103 safety climate factors spanning over a period of 39 years (1980–2019) are discussed. The most prevailing safety climate factors including management commitment, training, employees’ involvement, behaviour, communication, accountability and justice, and leadership are discussed in the paper. It is recommended that the factors discussed in this paper may need to be validated first before they are incorporated in the assessment of the safety climate of a specific construction project and organisation in a country or region.

17 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2020.1777799

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tariq2020,
  title        = {{Safety climate factors in construction – a literature review}},
  author       = {Tariq Umar},
  journal      = {Policy and Practice in Health and Safety},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2020.1777799},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Safety climate factors in construction – a literature review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.54

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.48 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.