Missing from Right to Strike? The ILO’s Committee of Experts in Controversy

Yuqi Zhou

Industrial Law Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf023article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In late 2023, the ILO’s Governing Body referred to the ICJ for an advisory opinion on whether the right to strike is protected under ILO Convention No. 87. However, a more fundamental issue concerning the Experts Committee, which derived the right to strike from ILO Convention No. 87 since the 1950s, was removed from the referral list almost at the last minute. It risks reducing Right to Strike to a formalistic exercise, allowing the Employers to continually downplay the ILO jurisprudence on the right to strike as construed by the Experts. In response to the Employers’ assertion that the Committee has been a purely technical body for the past century, this article adopts a historical lens to elaborate on the Experts’ evolution to be a primary supervisory body facilitated by ILO tripartite constituents. It further argues that the Employers should be estopped from overturning their previous acceptance of the Experts’ evolution, accumulation of powers and interpretations of the right to strike.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf023

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yuqi2025,
  title        = {{Missing from Right to Strike? The ILO’s Committee of Experts in Controversy}},
  author       = {Yuqi Zhou},
  journal      = {Industrial Law Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf023},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Missing from Right to Strike? The ILO’s Committee of Experts in Controversy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.