Reframing Post‐Normal Accidents: Unpacking Variegated Neoliberalism in a Local Labor Regime

Sadık Kılıç & Büşra Yüksel Güngör

Antipode2026https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70141article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article reframes Post‐Normal Accident (Post‐NA) theory through the empirical case of Zonguldak by grounding it in labor‐regime analysis and extending its dialogue with variegated neoliberalism and cultural political economy. Drawing on comprehensive fieldwork and historical reconstruction, it argues that accidents are not aberrant events but historically embedded and continually reproduced outcomes of a variegated neoliberal labor regime that fuses externalization, financialization, and deregulation into a normalized logic of disposability. Empirical evidence shows how state‐owned, legal, and illegal mines articulate distinct modalities of neglect: from procedural formalism and subcontracted risk to fully unregulated extraction. Narratives of geology and standardization, alongside ambivalent idioms of fate, help render these failures intelligible and defensible, consolidating a “letting‐die” rationality that normalizes preventable harm as a routine feature of extraction. In doing so, the article extends Post‐NA theory toward a spatially grounded analysis of how systemic failures take shape within uneven labor regimes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70141

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sadık2026,
  title        = {{Reframing Post‐Normal Accidents: Unpacking Variegated Neoliberalism in a Local Labor Regime}},
  author       = {Sadık Kılıç & Büşra Yüksel Güngör},
  journal      = {Antipode},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70141},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reframing Post‐Normal Accidents: Unpacking Variegated Neoliberalism in a Local Labor Regime

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.