A Method to Estimate Discrete Choice Models That Is Robust to Consumer Search

Jason Abaluck et al.

Journal of Political Economy2026https://doi.org/10.1086/740223article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

We state a sufficient condition under which choice data alone suffices to identify consumer preferences when choices are not fully informed. Suppose that: (i) the data generating process is a search model in which the attribute hidden to consumers is observed by the econometrician; (ii) if a consumer searches good j, she also searches goods which are better than j in terms of the non-hidden component of utility; and (iii) consumers choose the good that maximizes overall utility among searched goods. Canonical models will be biased: the value of the hidden attribute will be understated because consumers will be unresponsive to variation in the attribute for goods that they do not search. Under the conditions above and additional mild restrictions, an alternative method of recovering preferences using cross derivatives of choice probabilities succeeds regardless of the search protocol and is thus robust to whether consumers are informed. The approach nests several standard models, including full information. Our methods suggest natural tests for full information and can be used to forecast how consumers will respond to additional information. We verify in a lab experiment that our approach succeeds in recovering preferences when consumers engage in costly search.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/740223

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jason2026,
  title        = {{A Method to Estimate Discrete Choice Models That Is Robust to Consumer Search}},
  author       = {Jason Abaluck et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Political Economy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/740223},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Method to Estimate Discrete Choice Models That Is Robust to Consumer Search

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.