Silenced Voices: How Violence Marginalizes Women and Immigrant Politicians in Policy Debates

Sandra Håkansson & Cecilia Josefsson

British Journal of Political Science2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123426101380article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract Free and open public debate is a cornerstone of democratic representation, yet many politicians refrain from participating in policy debates. This study examines how political violence contributes to such silencing and whether it disproportionately affects historically marginalized groups. Using a unique Swedish politician survey (five waves, N = 43,000), we analyze whether violence reduces marginalized politicians’ participation in debates and whether it disproportionately silences debates challenging hegemonic male interests. We find that women and immigrant-background politicians are significantly more likely than their counterparts to report withdrawing from public debates because of violence and to avoid a broader range of topics. Women are particularly likely to refrain from debates on gender equality, while immigrant-background politicians are not more likely to avoid immigration debates. These chilling effects suggest that violence can narrow the range of voices present in policy debates, potentially diminishing marginalized groups’ ability to represent constituents and reinforcing hegemonic men’s political dominance.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123426101380

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sandra2026,
  title        = {{Silenced Voices: How Violence Marginalizes Women and Immigrant Politicians in Policy Debates}},
  author       = {Sandra Håkansson & Cecilia Josefsson},
  journal      = {British Journal of Political Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123426101380},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Silenced Voices: How Violence Marginalizes Women and Immigrant Politicians in Policy Debates

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.