arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Retraction notice: Knowledge management practices: an exploratory study at the Malaysian higher education institutions

Unknown author

The Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-01-2026-0032article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The publishers of the Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning wish to retract the article V. Nair, B. and Munusami, C. (2019), “Knowledge management practices: An exploratory study at the Malaysian higher education institutions”, published in the Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 174-190, https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-01-2019-0008. It has come to our attention that a large proportion of this article is copied, without attribution, from several earlier articles.These were:The Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning submission guidelines make it clear that articles must be original and must not infringe any existing copyright.The authors wish to offer their honest regrets for not giving attribution to the original authors of the above mentioned works, and sincerely apologise for the error and the inconvenience caused. The publishers of the journal sincerely apologise to the readers and the original authors of the above mentioned works.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-01-2026-0032

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Retraction notice: Knowledge management practices: an exploratory study at the Malaysian higher education institutions}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {The Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-01-2026-0032},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Retraction notice: Knowledge management practices: an exploratory study at the Malaysian higher education institutions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.