The Supreme Court: How Did We Get Here? And What Comes Next?

Charles M. Cameron & Jonathan Kastellec

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science2024https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251324879article
ABDC B
Weight
0.72

Abstract

The politics of appointments have transformed the U.S. Supreme Court in recent years. We examine why and how the current conservative supermajority on the court came to be, with a particular focus on how this court stands apart from earlier ones. We trace the factors that allowed President Donald Trump to reshape the court with his three appointments in his first term and evaluate the importance of the conservative supermajority by connecting it to theories of the court’s collective decision-making. We show that the current court is the culmination of a “partisan sort” in appointments—a strict correlation between party and ideology—that began a few decades ago but did not fully crystallize until the 2010s. Finally, we summarize simulations that show why conservatives are likely to control the court for several decades.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251324879

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{charles2024,
  title        = {{The Supreme Court: How Did We Get Here? And What Comes Next?}},
  author       = {Charles M. Cameron & Jonathan Kastellec},
  journal      = {Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251324879},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Supreme Court: How Did We Get Here? And What Comes Next?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.72

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.